Nissan brought out Altima, the hot selling car in 2001. The Japanese automaker introduced its second generation in 2006, toughening the sedan’s popularity. With an aim of broadening its overall appeal, Nissan introduced a hybrid version of the car in January. And the much-awaited coupe has at last arrived.
When compared with other coupes, the Altima is not just a two-door version of the sedan. The engineers from Nissan has shortened the wheelbase by 101 mm,
Cut the overall length by 185 mm and lowered the height by 66 mm, giving the coupe a handsome look that could turn heads.
The coupe has the only sheet metal shared between two- and four-door Altimas is the hood. It has been endowed with a pair of idiosyncratic bucket seats with striking side bolsters for extra lateral support. The back of the coupe is a 60/40 split rear bench that extends the cargo space. The feature is ideal for a weekend of skiing or to hold few odds and sods from the store. It has a more conventional parking-brake hand lever substituting the sedan’s foot-operated control.
Power is the other big difference between the models. The base car is equipped with a 2.5-litre four-cylinder that successfully generates 175 horsepower and 180 pound-feet of torque, which is more than enough to be amusing when mated to the six-speed manual box. A big part for the spirited drive is attributed to the transmission’s close ratios and a light, progressive clutch that puts the bite point in the precise place.
The suspension is firmer and the steering is also adequately weighted and responsive when turned off-centre. Apart from this, the coupe include the Nissan headlight bulb, a push-button start, the dual-zone climate control, cruise control and heated seats, power mirrors, windows and sunroof, a six-speaker audio system with an auxiliary plug-in, six air bags and standard anti-lock brakes that assures that this enticing model will provide an admirable driving experience on roads.
Showing posts with label car. Show all posts
Showing posts with label car. Show all posts
Wednesday, January 14, 2009
Monday, January 12, 2009
New Presidential Limo Ready For Action Jan 20
Remember the new presidential limo that Cadillac designed to be PEW PEW proof? Well it's been approved for use starting January 20th and is jam-packed with all kinds of exciting features like extra presidential blood (I'm not kidding) and 8-inch thick (me too, ladies) doors that weigh as much as a 757's cabin door. I thought it was funny the driver side window is the only one that goes down and even it only 3-inches (me too, ladies) to "pay a toll or talk with secret service agents running alongside". Pay a toll? Get fucking real! I know the picture is small, so click here to see the full size image and read all those little words.
• It can withstand rocket impacts and it's perfectly sealed against biochemical attacks.
• Petrol tank: Can withstand a direct hit thanks to a special foam and armor-plating.
• Bodywork: made of dual hardness steel, aluminum, titanium, and ceramics to "break up posible projectiles".
• Tyres: Kevlar-reinforced with steel rims underneath so it can run away no matter what.
• Accessories include: Night vision cameras, pump-action shotguns, tear gas cannons.
• Comes with bottles of blood compatible with the President's blood.
• It can withstand rocket impacts and it's perfectly sealed against biochemical attacks.
• Petrol tank: Can withstand a direct hit thanks to a special foam and armor-plating.
• Bodywork: made of dual hardness steel, aluminum, titanium, and ceramics to "break up posible projectiles".
• Tyres: Kevlar-reinforced with steel rims underneath so it can run away no matter what.
• Accessories include: Night vision cameras, pump-action shotguns, tear gas cannons.
• Comes with bottles of blood compatible with the President's blood.
Labels:
bombs,
car,
communications,
damn,
fort,
hardcore,
i want,
impressive,
limo,
missiles,
personal safety,
pew pew proof,
president,
Safety,
secret agents,
tank,
tank limo,
wow,
yes please
Sunday, December 28, 2008
Faralli & Mazzanti’s Vulca, An Ultimate In Exotic Luxury
For those of you who think Ferraris and Lamborghinis are a little too common, then the Italian exotic auto builder Faralli & Mazzanti might have just the answer. The team of reserachers, designers and engineers at the company have produced only 10 numbered examples of their eye-catching Etruscan -inspired Vulca S Coupe with an unbelievable attention to detail.
The car priced at a whopping $390,000, is named after the famous Etruscan sculptor Vulca da Veio known for his artistice expressions of the mysterious and ancient population of Etruscan world, including the “Apollo di Veio”. It constitutes a lightweight, hand beaten all-aluminum body that is fashioned such that it look all “sinous, modern, elegant yet aggressive in style”.
If you look under the hood, you will find a powerful and reliable engine that is indeed part of the latest generation in technology. So much so that an exhilarating driving experience is assured. Yes, after all, the 5.8-liter V10 engine gives 600 HP. The interior has diamond stitched leather with a luxe wood trim.
Via seriouswheels
The car priced at a whopping $390,000, is named after the famous Etruscan sculptor Vulca da Veio known for his artistice expressions of the mysterious and ancient population of Etruscan world, including the “Apollo di Veio”. It constitutes a lightweight, hand beaten all-aluminum body that is fashioned such that it look all “sinous, modern, elegant yet aggressive in style”.
If you look under the hood, you will find a powerful and reliable engine that is indeed part of the latest generation in technology. So much so that an exhilarating driving experience is assured. Yes, after all, the 5.8-liter V10 engine gives 600 HP. The interior has diamond stitched leather with a luxe wood trim.
Via seriouswheels
Saturday, December 13, 2008
Motor Trend and Automobile Magazine name the Nissan GT-R “Car of the Year”— But does it deserve the title?
It was an unremarkable but pleasant day this past weekend. I have sumptuously managed to wake up at 1:29 in the afternoon, a feat exceeded only by the previous day’s record of 1:40 P.M. After developing an exceedingly unhealthy outlook on life due to screaming an inordinate amount of abuse at my ancient, mentally diseased Windows ME Edition computer, I got the mail.
Sifting through the usual crap, my spirits are lifted by a little red envelope, courtesy of Netflix. I lifted something away and am pleasantly surprised to see that my Motor Trend has arrived.
Allow me to distill the next few nanoseconds of information processing: I first notice the cool futuristic green background of the magazine, I then identify the hideous Nissan GT-R on the cover, then my eyes flick up to: “CAR OF THE YEAR”. My eyes flick back down. They flick up to the top, to reaffirm that this is indeed Motor Trend. They then repeat their first two flicks.
“NOOOOOO! STUPID MOTHER F%$@#ER!”, I scream and hurl my magazine at the far wall, the sheer velocity ripping it to shreds. What I really do is just stare. And sigh.
If my previous sentences have not yet enlightened you to the fact that I dislike the Nissan GT-R, then here it is: I dislike the Nissan GT-R.
The main reason is because it is ugly. “Nissan has built the world’s ugliest, oversized electric shaver” states a MT editor, and I concur. But that would be like saying I don’t like the Toyota Camry, or the Chrysler Sebring. “Not liking” is not synonymous with “dislike”.
The other is that for some reason, I am inherently predisposed to dislike anything that everyone else adores. Example: when people herald BMW’s 3 Series, I champion Cadillac’s CTS. I also have strong feelings about “herd animals” (the kind of person who will mindlessly park next to you in an empty parking lot). I especially hate those fanatic brand-whores, the ones that flock to whatever has their specific badge, just because it bears that badge.
That sort of thing.
Most GT-R maniacs I’ve met are those cultists who know pretty much zip about the car. They don’t know the performance, the price, or any of the statistics. In a way they remind me of the BMW worshippers— even put the badge on a Pontiac Aztek and the faithful will come.
So I sit down and try to determine exactly why the GT-R wins (it was also Automobile Magazine’s Automobile of the Year). Can it be that my admittedly stubborn disposition is contaminating the realm of rational thought? Can the biased media be unbiased in their choice? Can the common cow or sheep have been right all along about automotive excellence? Well let’s find out. To the disliker of the GT-R, you may wish to re-evaluate the intensity of your feelings due to the following facts. Or not. To the crazed GT-R devotee who dreams perverted dreams of a GT-R , the following will only serve to reaffirm your sniveling love (and may even enlighten you to the facts).
First off, I must give props to Nissan for creating one of the few Japanese cars that look like they deserve to be sold. I certainly don’t think the GT-R is pretty, but Nissan’s Hiroshi Hasegawa, the chief product designer, deserves a stupendous and standing round o’ applause for shattering the mold and producing a controversially designed car (for whenever there is controversy, it means that said design is interesting enough to merit it). In an age of public opinion when “car” + “Japanese” invariably equates to “Prius”, having a sports car that looks the part certainly is refreshing.
Kazutoshi Mizuno, the chief vehicle engineer and chief product specialist of the GT-R, also deserves a standing ovation for bringing this car into being. The GT-R is his baby, for it is Japanese automotive custom to endow the chief vehicle engineer complete control over said vehicle. Most heavily involved with performance and dynamics, my man Mizuno has done made a Nissan supercar (sorta kinda not really) that has turned the performance car world upside down. Way to go.
Now to the main part, the part that has those knowledgeable cult fans screaming their damnfool heads off, and more sensible car journalists look happily bewildered— the performance. I’ll throw some facts out first: 0-60 mph in 3.3 seconds, top speed of 193 mph. Sound good? Now check these out: a V-6 engine, 480 horsepower, 430 pound-feet of torque, 3891 pounds curb weight, EPA estimated 16/21 mpg, $77,840 base price, seating for four. Viewed separately, the first and seconds groups of data associate well. It’s when you mix them together that all hell breaks loose.
For instance, how do supercar statistics mix with large luxury sedan or SUV attributes? How does the GT-R hit 193 mph with only a V-6 engine? For that matter, how does a car weighing more than a Saturn Vue, with the help of less horsepower and torque than a Shelby GT500, outgun to 60 mph a Lamborghini Gallardo LP560-4, and all for cheaper than a BMW M5? How, indeed.
In an interview with Popular Mechanics, Nissan’s design boss, Shiro Nakamura, stated that “The element of functionality is core to the GT-R.” Meaning the design ethos for the GT-R was function over form, which explains its sad deficiency in the “looks” department. However, the car is astonishingly aerodynamic, and its computer formulated shape has a low 0.27 drag coefficient. For those unfamiliar with this measurement (it’s not a horse, pound-foot, time, or speed, the horror) the lower the better. For context, a new Scion xB achieves a 0.32, and a Corvette Z06 gets a 0.28. A much ballyhooed aspect of the GT-R is a kink along the spine of the C-pillar. It’s said to enhance aerodynamics. The front fender louvers are functional, improve airflow, and help cool the demonic, household appliance sounding twin turbo engine.
The body itself is composed of a variety of metals. Fancy forms of steel make up most of what you see, while more steel, aluminum, and carbon fiber are meshed together for stuff like the suspension braces, engine bay, and door insides. The underbody boasts polypropylene, glass-fiber, and more carbon.
The engine is hand built by a single technician in a climate controlled room. The cylinders are plasma coated, and twin IHI turbochargers round out the deal.
Let me now pause and make a confession: I have no idea what I’m talking about. That doesn’t mean the above information is wrong, it is simply too technical for me to understand. I only include it because I sense that it is relevant to the GT-R’s secret. If, like me, you could barely fathom high school chemistry, then feel free to skip the jargon. There will be straightforward car-writing after the technical barrage.
Perhaps the most important part of the GT-R is the transmission. Part of the reason why the GT-R possesses such speedy 0-60 scoots is due to its super short gearing. The advantage of this is that shorter gearing gives the engine more power, or “leverage” over the wheels. The downside is that the transmission must go through more shifts. For example, a Corvette Z06 can hit 60 mph just in first gear; the GT-R reaches the same speed only after two time consuming shifts. To make up for this, Nissan employs the trick of uninterrupted torque during shifts. From what I understand, in a normal car, during the time between clicking the paddle and accelerating in the next gear, the clutch disengages before the next gear shifts in. With the GT-R, power continues to flow, giving a “boost” when the next gear does shift in.
The GT-R features an advanced ATTESA E-TS system. It’s an all wheel drive system that differs from standard kinds in that it can control the amount of torque distributed to each wheel. And though the GT-R is a rear-drive vehicle, up to 50 percent of the torque can be delivered to the front wheels. The ATTESA E-TS system constantly takes measurements and makes decisions based on sensors that measure almost everything, and continuously adjusts the torque flow.
And finally, the GT-R is the world’s first production car to feature “Independent Transaxle 4WD”. Which is basically a rear-mounted transaxle with two independent propeller shafts. Boil those words down and you get “each axle can control tire grip without manipulation from the other”.
Handling-wise, suffice it to say that the GT-R is a beast. Mostly. Predominant flaws include a piggish understeer that can suddenly change into a snapping oversteer if you upset the car around the track, bad ride quality, and the video-game persona of the car. Top speed is 193 mph, but the suspension makes this trip a terribly frightening ride (the “Comfort” setting is an astonishingly boldfaced lie). Even at normal speeds, the GT-R suffers from a below average ride, due to its ultra-stiff suspension.
The remarkably detached, video-game personality of the GT-R has drawn much criticism. That is, when you turn the wheel, the car turns, if you step on the brake, the car stops, and if you step on the other pedal, the car moves. There is no emotion to the car, and driving it is like playing a futuristic Gran Turismo game. Laments a MT tester, “If someone buys a car for more than just pure performance, i.e., emotional feel, the GT-R would be at a disadvantage”.
The interior of this car has received mixed reviews. Some say it looks too cheap and straightforward, the opposition responding with: it’s only 78 K. A Chevy Malibu has a nicer interior comes the response, the GT-R is a pure performance machine and is thus exempt from nice interiors chirps up the opposition, then why do you bitch about the Corvette? comes the riposte.
Whatever. What you like is what you will prefer. While unemotional, the interior gets the job done well enough. A highlight is the Play Station-esque screen that provides fairly useless but hugely entertaining data.
Overall, however, it is what the Nissan GT-R can do that astonishes. Forget the “in spite of” and the “for the money”. Outracing to 60 mph such beasts as a Porsche 911 Turbo, the Gallardo LP560-4, and the Mercedes SLR McLaren is impressive no matter what the vehicle is. Factor in all that should hinder it— nearly two tons, a V-6 engine, measly power and torque numbers, and all for less than 80 K. Getting 21 mpg highway is respectable (cough cough) as well, while four seats even make it somewhat practical. Mix everything together… and the winner is clear. The GT-R is beastly (if somewhat emotionless), shocking, controversial, and in this year’s test of brand new cars… unbeatable. “You don’t have to like it”, writes Automobile Magazine, “You just have to stay the hell out of its way.”
I don’t like the Nissan GT-R. In fact, I wouldn’t be caught dead in one. Even after writing this article, my feelings remain the same. Nevertheless, the GT-R has been chosen twice as this year’s best car because it deserves to be. It has seemingly defied the laws of physics, broke with convention, and most importantly: shattered the current performance car status quo. I don’t like the car, but I acknowledge its merit. Good choice Motor Trend and Automobile Magazine. Congratulations Nissan, and congratulations to the GT-R.
Source: Motor Trend, Automobile Magazine, and Popular Mechanics
Sifting through the usual crap, my spirits are lifted by a little red envelope, courtesy of Netflix. I lifted something away and am pleasantly surprised to see that my Motor Trend has arrived.
Allow me to distill the next few nanoseconds of information processing: I first notice the cool futuristic green background of the magazine, I then identify the hideous Nissan GT-R on the cover, then my eyes flick up to: “CAR OF THE YEAR”. My eyes flick back down. They flick up to the top, to reaffirm that this is indeed Motor Trend. They then repeat their first two flicks.
“NOOOOOO! STUPID MOTHER F%$@#ER!”, I scream and hurl my magazine at the far wall, the sheer velocity ripping it to shreds. What I really do is just stare. And sigh.
If my previous sentences have not yet enlightened you to the fact that I dislike the Nissan GT-R, then here it is: I dislike the Nissan GT-R.
The main reason is because it is ugly. “Nissan has built the world’s ugliest, oversized electric shaver” states a MT editor, and I concur. But that would be like saying I don’t like the Toyota Camry, or the Chrysler Sebring. “Not liking” is not synonymous with “dislike”.
The other is that for some reason, I am inherently predisposed to dislike anything that everyone else adores. Example: when people herald BMW’s 3 Series, I champion Cadillac’s CTS. I also have strong feelings about “herd animals” (the kind of person who will mindlessly park next to you in an empty parking lot). I especially hate those fanatic brand-whores, the ones that flock to whatever has their specific badge, just because it bears that badge.
That sort of thing.
Most GT-R maniacs I’ve met are those cultists who know pretty much zip about the car. They don’t know the performance, the price, or any of the statistics. In a way they remind me of the BMW worshippers— even put the badge on a Pontiac Aztek and the faithful will come.
So I sit down and try to determine exactly why the GT-R wins (it was also Automobile Magazine’s Automobile of the Year). Can it be that my admittedly stubborn disposition is contaminating the realm of rational thought? Can the biased media be unbiased in their choice? Can the common cow or sheep have been right all along about automotive excellence? Well let’s find out. To the disliker of the GT-R, you may wish to re-evaluate the intensity of your feelings due to the following facts. Or not. To the crazed GT-R devotee who dreams perverted dreams of a GT-R , the following will only serve to reaffirm your sniveling love (and may even enlighten you to the facts).
First off, I must give props to Nissan for creating one of the few Japanese cars that look like they deserve to be sold. I certainly don’t think the GT-R is pretty, but Nissan’s Hiroshi Hasegawa, the chief product designer, deserves a stupendous and standing round o’ applause for shattering the mold and producing a controversially designed car (for whenever there is controversy, it means that said design is interesting enough to merit it). In an age of public opinion when “car” + “Japanese” invariably equates to “Prius”, having a sports car that looks the part certainly is refreshing.
Kazutoshi Mizuno, the chief vehicle engineer and chief product specialist of the GT-R, also deserves a standing ovation for bringing this car into being. The GT-R is his baby, for it is Japanese automotive custom to endow the chief vehicle engineer complete control over said vehicle. Most heavily involved with performance and dynamics, my man Mizuno has done made a Nissan supercar (sorta kinda not really) that has turned the performance car world upside down. Way to go.
Now to the main part, the part that has those knowledgeable cult fans screaming their damnfool heads off, and more sensible car journalists look happily bewildered— the performance. I’ll throw some facts out first: 0-60 mph in 3.3 seconds, top speed of 193 mph. Sound good? Now check these out: a V-6 engine, 480 horsepower, 430 pound-feet of torque, 3891 pounds curb weight, EPA estimated 16/21 mpg, $77,840 base price, seating for four. Viewed separately, the first and seconds groups of data associate well. It’s when you mix them together that all hell breaks loose.
For instance, how do supercar statistics mix with large luxury sedan or SUV attributes? How does the GT-R hit 193 mph with only a V-6 engine? For that matter, how does a car weighing more than a Saturn Vue, with the help of less horsepower and torque than a Shelby GT500, outgun to 60 mph a Lamborghini Gallardo LP560-4, and all for cheaper than a BMW M5? How, indeed.
In an interview with Popular Mechanics, Nissan’s design boss, Shiro Nakamura, stated that “The element of functionality is core to the GT-R.” Meaning the design ethos for the GT-R was function over form, which explains its sad deficiency in the “looks” department. However, the car is astonishingly aerodynamic, and its computer formulated shape has a low 0.27 drag coefficient. For those unfamiliar with this measurement (it’s not a horse, pound-foot, time, or speed, the horror) the lower the better. For context, a new Scion xB achieves a 0.32, and a Corvette Z06 gets a 0.28. A much ballyhooed aspect of the GT-R is a kink along the spine of the C-pillar. It’s said to enhance aerodynamics. The front fender louvers are functional, improve airflow, and help cool the demonic, household appliance sounding twin turbo engine.
The body itself is composed of a variety of metals. Fancy forms of steel make up most of what you see, while more steel, aluminum, and carbon fiber are meshed together for stuff like the suspension braces, engine bay, and door insides. The underbody boasts polypropylene, glass-fiber, and more carbon.
The engine is hand built by a single technician in a climate controlled room. The cylinders are plasma coated, and twin IHI turbochargers round out the deal.
Let me now pause and make a confession: I have no idea what I’m talking about. That doesn’t mean the above information is wrong, it is simply too technical for me to understand. I only include it because I sense that it is relevant to the GT-R’s secret. If, like me, you could barely fathom high school chemistry, then feel free to skip the jargon. There will be straightforward car-writing after the technical barrage.
Perhaps the most important part of the GT-R is the transmission. Part of the reason why the GT-R possesses such speedy 0-60 scoots is due to its super short gearing. The advantage of this is that shorter gearing gives the engine more power, or “leverage” over the wheels. The downside is that the transmission must go through more shifts. For example, a Corvette Z06 can hit 60 mph just in first gear; the GT-R reaches the same speed only after two time consuming shifts. To make up for this, Nissan employs the trick of uninterrupted torque during shifts. From what I understand, in a normal car, during the time between clicking the paddle and accelerating in the next gear, the clutch disengages before the next gear shifts in. With the GT-R, power continues to flow, giving a “boost” when the next gear does shift in.
The GT-R features an advanced ATTESA E-TS system. It’s an all wheel drive system that differs from standard kinds in that it can control the amount of torque distributed to each wheel. And though the GT-R is a rear-drive vehicle, up to 50 percent of the torque can be delivered to the front wheels. The ATTESA E-TS system constantly takes measurements and makes decisions based on sensors that measure almost everything, and continuously adjusts the torque flow.
And finally, the GT-R is the world’s first production car to feature “Independent Transaxle 4WD”. Which is basically a rear-mounted transaxle with two independent propeller shafts. Boil those words down and you get “each axle can control tire grip without manipulation from the other”.
Handling-wise, suffice it to say that the GT-R is a beast. Mostly. Predominant flaws include a piggish understeer that can suddenly change into a snapping oversteer if you upset the car around the track, bad ride quality, and the video-game persona of the car. Top speed is 193 mph, but the suspension makes this trip a terribly frightening ride (the “Comfort” setting is an astonishingly boldfaced lie). Even at normal speeds, the GT-R suffers from a below average ride, due to its ultra-stiff suspension.
The remarkably detached, video-game personality of the GT-R has drawn much criticism. That is, when you turn the wheel, the car turns, if you step on the brake, the car stops, and if you step on the other pedal, the car moves. There is no emotion to the car, and driving it is like playing a futuristic Gran Turismo game. Laments a MT tester, “If someone buys a car for more than just pure performance, i.e., emotional feel, the GT-R would be at a disadvantage”.
The interior of this car has received mixed reviews. Some say it looks too cheap and straightforward, the opposition responding with: it’s only 78 K. A Chevy Malibu has a nicer interior comes the response, the GT-R is a pure performance machine and is thus exempt from nice interiors chirps up the opposition, then why do you bitch about the Corvette? comes the riposte.
Whatever. What you like is what you will prefer. While unemotional, the interior gets the job done well enough. A highlight is the Play Station-esque screen that provides fairly useless but hugely entertaining data.
Overall, however, it is what the Nissan GT-R can do that astonishes. Forget the “in spite of” and the “for the money”. Outracing to 60 mph such beasts as a Porsche 911 Turbo, the Gallardo LP560-4, and the Mercedes SLR McLaren is impressive no matter what the vehicle is. Factor in all that should hinder it— nearly two tons, a V-6 engine, measly power and torque numbers, and all for less than 80 K. Getting 21 mpg highway is respectable (cough cough) as well, while four seats even make it somewhat practical. Mix everything together… and the winner is clear. The GT-R is beastly (if somewhat emotionless), shocking, controversial, and in this year’s test of brand new cars… unbeatable. “You don’t have to like it”, writes Automobile Magazine, “You just have to stay the hell out of its way.”
I don’t like the Nissan GT-R. In fact, I wouldn’t be caught dead in one. Even after writing this article, my feelings remain the same. Nevertheless, the GT-R has been chosen twice as this year’s best car because it deserves to be. It has seemingly defied the laws of physics, broke with convention, and most importantly: shattered the current performance car status quo. I don’t like the car, but I acknowledge its merit. Good choice Motor Trend and Automobile Magazine. Congratulations Nissan, and congratulations to the GT-R.
Source: Motor Trend, Automobile Magazine, and Popular Mechanics
Saturday, December 6, 2008
Solar car completes 1st ever round-the-world trip
Poland :
The first solar-powered car to travel around the world ended its journey at the U.N. climate talks Thursday, arriving with the message that clean technologies are available now to stop global warming.
The small two-seater, hauling a trailer of solar cells and carrying chief U.N. climate official Yvo de Boer, glided up to a building in Poznan, Poland, where delegates from some 190 nations are working toward a new treaty to control climate change.
“This is the first time in history that a solar-powered car has traveled all the way around the world without using a single drop of petrol,” said Louis Palmer, the 36-year-old Swiss schoolteacher and adventurer who made the trip.
“These new technologies are ready,” he said. “It’s ecological, it’s economical, it is absolutely reliable. We can stop global warning.”
Palmer’s appearance at the conference marked the end of a 32,000-mile (52,000-kilometer) journey that began 17 months ago in Lucerne, Switzerland and took him through 38 countries.

The car, which runs noiselessly, can travel up to 55 mph (90 kph) and covers 185 miles (300 kilometers) on a fully charged battery.
Palmer said he lost only two days to breakdowns during the journey.
“This car runs like a Swiss clock,” he said.
He calls his vehicle, which was developed by scientists at Swiss universities, a “solar taxi” because he has given rides to about 1,000 people _ officials and regular folk alike _ to convince them of the technology’s viability.
Passengers have included New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg and U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon.
Delegates in Poznan are seeking an ambitious new climate treaty that would replace the Kyoto Protocol, which expires in 2012 and has required that 37 countries slash emissions of heat-trapping gases by an average 5 percent from 1990 levels.
The goal is for the new treaty to be finalized at the next U.N. climate meeting in December 2009 in Copenhagen, Denmark.
“Here at the conference, we are talking about reducing emissions by 10 or 20 percent,” Palmer said. “I want to show that we can reduce emissions by 100 percent _ and that’s what we need for the future.”
_____
On the Net:
http://www.solartaxi.com/
The first solar-powered car to travel around the world ended its journey at the U.N. climate talks Thursday, arriving with the message that clean technologies are available now to stop global warming.
The small two-seater, hauling a trailer of solar cells and carrying chief U.N. climate official Yvo de Boer, glided up to a building in Poznan, Poland, where delegates from some 190 nations are working toward a new treaty to control climate change.
“This is the first time in history that a solar-powered car has traveled all the way around the world without using a single drop of petrol,” said Louis Palmer, the 36-year-old Swiss schoolteacher and adventurer who made the trip.
“These new technologies are ready,” he said. “It’s ecological, it’s economical, it is absolutely reliable. We can stop global warning.”
Palmer’s appearance at the conference marked the end of a 32,000-mile (52,000-kilometer) journey that began 17 months ago in Lucerne, Switzerland and took him through 38 countries.

The car, which runs noiselessly, can travel up to 55 mph (90 kph) and covers 185 miles (300 kilometers) on a fully charged battery.
Palmer said he lost only two days to breakdowns during the journey.
“This car runs like a Swiss clock,” he said.
He calls his vehicle, which was developed by scientists at Swiss universities, a “solar taxi” because he has given rides to about 1,000 people _ officials and regular folk alike _ to convince them of the technology’s viability.
Passengers have included New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg and U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon.
Delegates in Poznan are seeking an ambitious new climate treaty that would replace the Kyoto Protocol, which expires in 2012 and has required that 37 countries slash emissions of heat-trapping gases by an average 5 percent from 1990 levels.
The goal is for the new treaty to be finalized at the next U.N. climate meeting in December 2009 in Copenhagen, Denmark.
“Here at the conference, we are talking about reducing emissions by 10 or 20 percent,” Palmer said. “I want to show that we can reduce emissions by 100 percent _ and that’s what we need for the future.”
_____
On the Net:
http://www.solartaxi.com/
Wednesday, November 26, 2008
Hit-and-run cases: Why blame the beemer?
“No BMW, go for any other beast but not the BMW”, this is what my friend’s dad pressed when we decided to go for the vehicle. The whole family was against the idea as the beemer has been getting some extremely bad press for quite sometime. Whenever it has come in the news, it has been with connection to some hit and run case or the other.
India has seen two high profile hit and run cases recently, one involving Sanjiv Nanda, the grandson of a formal Navy Chief, and the other one involving teenager Utsav Bhasin, the son of a renowned industrialist. Both of them come from affluent families, and the car involved in both the accidents, was a beemer. Media, pounced upon the cases with the tagline - “BMW Hit and Run Case”.
The Indian television news channels, who aspire to be more sensational than the best thriller you ever saw, have also been more dramatic and repetitive than any daily soap can ever claim to be. Discussed around the television screens at an amazingly repetitive and sensationalized coverage, the general public has been more than confused. While many people may not know the name of the people involved in these incidents, or of the lives lost as a result, what has stuck is the brand of the car(s) in these incidents. The result – A tarnished brand image.
A basic fact that appears to have been overlooked in the media scrutiny of these cases is that cars don’t drive themselves. The name of the marque is repeated so vehemently in certain sections of these reports, it almost appears that the vehicle decided to disobey its master and to ram into some innocent bystander. So, I will take a leaf out of the television reporter’s dictionary and repeat myself; Cars don’t drive themselves. It is common sense that things will go awry when a person is driving under the influence of some kind of intoxication - be it alcohol or something else - the brand of the car involved is quite immaterial in such circumstances. When the reins are in the driver’s hands, why blame the brand?
Now to get back to our fascination for the beemer...no worries! With the arguments set out above, it was a matter of time before we made the elders see our point of view. No wonder, BMW won two Kelley Blue Book Brand Image Awards at the 2008 New York International Auto Show. Check out more in the gallery and decide for yourself.
India has seen two high profile hit and run cases recently, one involving Sanjiv Nanda, the grandson of a formal Navy Chief, and the other one involving teenager Utsav Bhasin, the son of a renowned industrialist. Both of them come from affluent families, and the car involved in both the accidents, was a beemer. Media, pounced upon the cases with the tagline - “BMW Hit and Run Case”.
The Indian television news channels, who aspire to be more sensational than the best thriller you ever saw, have also been more dramatic and repetitive than any daily soap can ever claim to be. Discussed around the television screens at an amazingly repetitive and sensationalized coverage, the general public has been more than confused. While many people may not know the name of the people involved in these incidents, or of the lives lost as a result, what has stuck is the brand of the car(s) in these incidents. The result – A tarnished brand image.
A basic fact that appears to have been overlooked in the media scrutiny of these cases is that cars don’t drive themselves. The name of the marque is repeated so vehemently in certain sections of these reports, it almost appears that the vehicle decided to disobey its master and to ram into some innocent bystander. So, I will take a leaf out of the television reporter’s dictionary and repeat myself; Cars don’t drive themselves. It is common sense that things will go awry when a person is driving under the influence of some kind of intoxication - be it alcohol or something else - the brand of the car involved is quite immaterial in such circumstances. When the reins are in the driver’s hands, why blame the brand?
Now to get back to our fascination for the beemer...no worries! With the arguments set out above, it was a matter of time before we made the elders see our point of view. No wonder, BMW won two Kelley Blue Book Brand Image Awards at the 2008 New York International Auto Show. Check out more in the gallery and decide for yourself.
Labels:
BMW,
car,
Hit and Run,
India,
Sanjiv Nanda,
Technology,
Utsav Bhasin
Sunday, November 23, 2008
Creepy! Audi R8 burns on a street in Germany
You all know the R8 super car from Audi, but I bet you didn’t imagine this. Here is what’s left of a beautiful Audi R8 after it burst into flames on a street in Germany. While it seems there were some reports of several R8s that burned while in development, this is a production model. It seems that fuel spillage is what caused this, but on R8talk forums there are also some other speculations.
Whatever the reason, I think this affects Audi image pretty bad, because I find this unacceptable to a serious producer like Audi, especially on a super car, which is supposed to be at the highest level of engineering.
Whatever the reason, I think this affects Audi image pretty bad, because I find this unacceptable to a serious producer like Audi, especially on a super car, which is supposed to be at the highest level of engineering.
Fiat 126 Flat Out is the lowest lowrider ever
When I came across this one, at first I thought it was an RC lawnmower. Nope. It’s just the lowest car ever. The Fiat 126 Flat Out is touted as the world’s lowest vehicle, at just under 22-inches tall. Even more surprising, it was built by Andy Saunders and his two man team in just THREE days. Those were 18-hour days. He built the car as part of the celebrations for the 40th Annual Autojumble at the National Motor Museum in Beaulieu, Hampshire. Awesome as it is, it would be pretty sweet to see this thing mowing a huge stretch of lawn at super speeds.
[Seriouswheels]
[Seriouswheels]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)