Showing posts with label cars news. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cars news. Show all posts

Monday, January 12, 2009

Top Gear's The Stig revealed as married man 'who drives boring car'

One of motor-racings most guarded secrets has been answered - Top Gear's The Stig has been unmasked as a married man in his 30s who lives in a £300,000 house with a boring £15,000 car.


Man behind the mask: The Stig is now known to be married and in his thirties, although the mysterious Top Gear character has not been named Photo: BBC / LEE BRIMBLE

Some say his tongue can strip the paint off a Porsche in 30 seconds, and that his first name really is 'The'.

Until now, all we knew was he was called The Stig.

But his secret identity appears now to have been leaked.

He is a married man, who lives in a comfortable £300,000 home and drives an unglamorous £15,000 car.

The racing star, who tests new cars and coaches celebrities in the Star in a Reasonably Price Car segment on the show featuring Jeremy Clarkson, Richard Hammond and James May has always kept his identity a closely-guarded secret.

The News Of The World discovered his true identity thanks to a leak in the BBC show.

Although not revealing his name, it gave some clues into the mysterious man's identity.

He found his first track outing when he was younger "terrifying" but this did not stop him from racing in Formula First, GT Racing and Stock Cars, while he almost made it to Formula One.

He is in his 30s, and earns around £150,000 a year combining his Top Gear job with some stunt and test driving.

A BBC source told the newspaper: "This is the best-kept secret in motor racing and we want to keep it that way.

"No one will ever officially confirm his identity."

It would appear the current version of The Stig has no intention of following in the footsteps of his predecessor Perry McCarthy.

McCarthy was The original Stig for 22 Top Gears but was "killed off" by being shot off the end of aircraft carrier HMS Invincible in a rocket-powered vehicle after revealing his secret. 

Sunday, January 4, 2009

The world’s cheapest car could become the world’s cheapest hybrid

Indian carmaker Tata Motors will offer a micro-hybrid version of the Nano—its ultra-affordable small car—according to a leading Indian business television channel. Micro-hybrid technology allows a vehicle to reduce fuel consumption and emissions by about 5 to 10 percent.

The report on CNBC-TV18 said that Bosch, a leading German engineering firm, will supply the micro-hybrid, also known as a stop-start system, which automatically turns off the car’s engine while the vehicle is not moving. Bosch already supplies fuel and braking systems to the Nano.


CNBC-TV18’s Sumantra Barooah said that the micro-hybrid technology would add 4,000 to 6,000 rupees to the Nano's cost—meaning an additional couple of hundred dollars. Barooah said, “It becomes a challenge to how much the engineers can control the cost of this technology.” With the micro-hybrid Nano, Tata will attempt to use the auto industry’s least expensive hybrid technology in the world’s least expensive car.

Micro-hybrids can be deployed at a much lower cost than full hybrid systems, and are therefore forecast to become widespread as countries adopt tighter standards for fuel economy and fuel emissions.

In his report, Barooah said that a micro-hybrid version would join diesel and all-electric variants of the Nano. The micro-hybrid technology will first be rolled out in the Tata Indica.

The People's Hybrid

Tata created an international stir in January 2008 when it unveiled Nano, claiming that it would be the world’s cheapest car. With a starting target price of approximately US $2,500, the Nano could make private car ownership accessible to tens of millions of Indian citizens. Tata nicknamed the Nano as “the people’s car.”

While the four-passenger vehicle would be aimed primarily at the Indian market, the 33-horsepower Nano could have an impact in other global markets—if the car could be proven safe and reliable. To reach major markets throughout the world, the Nano would also need to pass emissions standards—an issue which could be addressed by using the micro-hybrid technology.

Tata aimed to begin an annual production of 250,000 units of the Tata Nano in 2008, but has not announced that production has begun. There’s no indication when the micro-hybrid and electric versions of Nano would be scheduled for production.

Tuesday, December 30, 2008

Green Car Journal selects Mitsubishi i MiEV as Possible Green Car Vision Winner

Mitsubishi Motors' i MiEV electric car was selected by the Green Car Journal as one of five nominees for its 2009 Green Car Vision™ award, an honor that recognizes one vehicle that best envisions the future of transportation.

The winner will be announced February 3, 2009 at the Washington Auto Show in Washington D.C.

"We are pleased the i MiEV is getting this recognition," said Dan Kuhnert, executive vice president of Mitsubishi Motors North America. "Its design and execution are ideally suited to meet the urban transportation needs of a rapidly changing world."

The zero-emission i MiEV uses a state-of-the-art, 330-volt lithium-ion battery to power a 47 kW permanent-magnet motor. The compact, lightweight battery is situated under the floor, its small size helping to maximize the roomy four-passenger cabin while minimizing the car's overall footprint.

"Vehicles offering dramatically improved environmental performance are crucial to helping us move beyond today's challenges of oil dependence and growing environmental impacts," explained Ron Cogan, editor and publisher of the Green Car Journal and editor of GreenCar.com.

Having completed extensive fleet-testing in Japan for the past two years, Mitsubishi's inventive i MiEV is currently undergoing fleet testing in a joint effort with two California utilities-Southern California Edison and Pacific Gas & Electric. It is scheduled to go on sale to the public in Japan this summer.



Press release via Mitsubishi

Porsche’s Wiedeking Writes Letter From Hell

Wendelin Wiedeking, chief of a bank with attached sheet-metal fabrication named Porsche, used the quiet time between the holidays to sit down and pen a letter to all employees. He had to get it off his chest. Usually, this is the time for well wishes and brave forecasts. This time, it’s different. At least at Porsche. Even the most dopamine-saturated Porsche employee will be deeply depressed after reading Wiedekings new year letter. Sales of Valium and harder drugs, such as Schnapps, probably went through the roof in Zuffenhausen after the letter was opened. Automobilwoche (sub) obtained a copy of the inspirational message.

“Don’t let the high profitability of our company fool you. Dark clouds cover the skies. Due to the crisis in the financial markets, we are in a recession which we had not seen for many decades.” So far, so bad. Everybody who can read or watch TV knows that by now.

The missive continues with the usual yadda yadda of all auto makers being in a deep sales slump. Aber Achtung! Even Porsche, the company that could make more profits than sales, suddenly is not immune: “Despite being better prepared than most of the competition, we will not remain unscathed by the drops in demand.” Uh-oh.  “Reduction in demand” usually is a precursor for “reduction in jobs.” As Wiedeking is looking ahead, the wisdom of building a Cayenne becomes as clear as it possibly can get:


Every Porsche worker will need one, because “in front of us lies a rocky road, and we don’t know its distance.  Surviving the dry spell will demand our utmost dedication and attention.”  Get your Cayenne, top up, and hydrate up, boys!

In case people haven’t gotten it at this point, Wendy spells it out: “We will lower our production. We’d rather build one car less than one too many. ” Still don’t understand where he’s going? Ok, write that down: “There is need for serious belt tightening.”

Ah, wait, there is one optimistic sentence in Wendy’s letter: “With the launch of the Panamera we will surely succeed in stabilizing our sales in the coming year.”

According to the German newspaper Der Tagesspiegel, Wiedeking made (at today’s rate) $142m in 2008. Good reason for the German business daily Handelsblatt to pronounce Wiedeking the “best paid auto manager of the world.” Compared to Wendy, Mulally and Wagoner earn minimum wage. A little belt tightening should be good for the waistline.

But Wiedeking didn’t write the letter to himself. However, he wrote, well, at least he signed it all by himself. Automobilwoche found it worthy to note that the letter was signed by Wiedeking only, and not by the other members of the Porsche board.

Automobilwoche »

Monday, December 22, 2008

Technically, The 2010 Chevrolet Camaro Will Start At $7000

The technicality we're speaking of in the title is the fact that GM Performance Parts has announced that it'll offer a Camaro body in white package for customizers and racers to purchase. The basic package that costs $7000 includes the assembled body structure, including the front fenders, hood, front valence/grille header panel, roof, doors, rear quarters, truck lid, and rear valence. Floorpans and chassis rails are also included. So what's the catch? Your $7000, while also lacking wheels, tires, an interior, lights, suspension, glass, and, what are we forgetting. . . oh yes, a drivetrain, the body in white Camaro lacks a VIN number, so it won't be street legal.

Still, this is a great idea and a unique opportunity for racers who plan to junk the base car's vital organs, anyway. It also saves the time and money of stripping out the interior, though it adds the time of giving the car seats and gauges, not to mention a steering wheel, shifter, and the transmission that shifter controls. Luckily, GM Performance also sells all the things you'll need to make your track Camaro complete.

PRESS RELEASE

RACERS REJOICE! GM PERFORMANCE PARTS TO OFFER NEW CAMARO BODIES IN WHITE

Grand Blanc, Mich. - Racers who want to slip into something more fashionable at the track next year will find the 2010 Camaro is just their size. GM Performance Parts will offer body in white packages of the new Camaro starting in the first quarter of 2009.

The basic package lists for $7,000 and includes an assembled body structure, including the front fenders, hood, front valance/grille header panel, roof, doors, rear quarters, trunk lid and rear valance. The structure also includes the complete floorpans and chassis rails.

Racer must fill out an online application to be eligible to purchase one. The form is available at www.gmperformanceparts.com. Bodies will be sold on a first-come, first-serve basis. There is no limit to the number an approved racing team can purchase.

"This is the easiest and most cost-effective way to build a race-ready new Camaro," said Dr. Jamie Meyer, of GM Performance Parts. "We envision racers using these bodies for all types of competition, from Pro Street and Competition drag racing to road racing."

The body in white includes only a painted body shell and no additional components or materials. The bodies do not have vehicle identification numbers, so they may only be used as racing vehicles that will never be licensed for street driving.

Racers will add powertrain, fuel system, suspension, interior components and glass (or sanctioning body-approved alternative), and safety equipment, then go racing.

"For the racers who would strip down the entire car and replace most of the components with racing-spec parts, the body in white saves time and money," said Dr. Meyer. "Drag racers, for example, won't have to worry about swapping out for a solid axle - they can just bolt one up and go."

The body in white's unadorned interior also saves time and money by allowing racing teams to eliminate the process of stripping a fully equipment production car in order to reduce weight and prep the chassis for a roll cage.

And when it comes to building up the body in white, GM Performance Parts offers crate engines, engine controllers, high-performance transmissions and hundreds of other parts to help complete the project - including dedicated drag racing engines and engine suited for circle track and road racing competition.

GM Performance Parts - Tested to the Limits, Backed by GM

GM Performance Parts crate engines undergo a 50-hour, full-throttle engine dynamometer validation; requiring that the engines perform from peak horsepower to peak torque. And if that's not enough, GMPP installs crate engines in its own engineering vehicles for ongoing testing and continuous improvement. It's that commitment to quality and durability that allows General Motors to back GM Performance Parts crate engines with a 24 month / 50,000 mile warranty (whichever occurs first). All GM Performance Parts components carry a 12 months / 12,000 miles warranty.

Enthusiasts who crave the latest technology, maximum horsepower and the expertise and confidence backed by GM, can purchase GMPP crate engines, blocks, heads, high performance transmissions and components, from GMPP Authorized Center dealers or any other GM dealership nationwide. For more information or to locate the closest GM dealership visit www.gmperformanceparts.com.

Sunday, December 21, 2008

Holy Shit! This Critter May Just Save The World. And the ICE

The beast in the picture sits in what’s commonly called your “lower intestinals.” And the butt-ugly critter may just be the answer to our energy problems. Bacteria that live in your digestive tracts, and that can give you the runs, can be genetically modified to eat plants and then shit out jet fuel, high grade gasoline and other petroleum products. According to a CBS report, this was proven by a team of UCLA researchers.

The oil we use so abundantly was made by bacteria also. Problem is, it took them millions of years. A few years ago, bacteria were trained to hurry up, munch plants and excrete the equivalent of low grade diesel. Nothing new to that: For centuries, bacteria were used the same way to make ethanol, hooch, or Taittinger champagne. But that’s all low-grade stuff with only two carbon atoms per molecule. The greater the number of carbon atoms, the greater the energy density of the fuel. The UCLA researchers already made their coli bugs excrete fuel with five carbon atoms per molecule. Alcohol molecules with eight carbon atoms may also be possible, they report in this month’s edition of the scientific journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. That, my friends, means bacteria that shit out straight gasoline.

“We wanted to create larger, longer-chain molecules because they contain more energy,” the team wrote in the science journal. “This is significant in the production of gasoline and even jet fuel.” The new E. Coli bugs would be unleashed on organic material. And if they succeed, they could give huge amount industries and boondoggle projects a big case of diarrhea. Will the internal combustion engine be saved by a bug that’s at home in our ass?

CBS »

Wednesday, December 17, 2008

NSX is out - what's next?

We're all absolutely gutted about the NSX being canned. I for one couldn't wait to see what Honda's take on the supercar would be this time around.

But we have to get a bit real. There's no Honda F1 team to justify trying to market a mega road car and while we would all love a new NSX it was never going to be one to boost Honda's bottom line - if it made money at all that is.

The question is whether other such esoteric performance cars are also about to be served a death sentence. Lexus's LFA looks vunerable as does the Lotus Esprit. We're not holding our breath for BMW's proposed supercar either.


Ford Promises Big Slim-Down with Next-Gen Platforms

DEARBORN, MI - Already talking big about the efficiency gains projected from its new downsized engines and six-speed automatic transmissions, Ford Motor Co. will engage a full-scale war against weight in its next product-development-led gambit to become the green-focused car company executives believe Ford must become to reemerge as a success in the U.S. and global auto markets.

The big cut in ever-bloating vehicle weight will come as Ford phases in the next-generation platforms for its product range, says Derrick Kuzak, group vice president of global product development.


"In our next-generation vehicles, we're going to go after weight in a big way," Kuzak told AutoObserver at a media event here.

In late 2007, Ford pledged with its "Blueprint For Sustainability" to cut vehicle weight by 250-750 pounds from 2012 to 2020. That kind of lightening-up is a heavy burden when about the best that can be claimed today is that a redesigned or heavily revised model at least hasn't added any weight.

Kuzak says that's because Ford currently is working its way through a "top-hat strategy" that has sees most of the company's new or coming vehicles based on an existing architecture that has not been weight-optimized. But when those existing vehicle platforms are replaced, Kuzak is promising serious weight reductions.

"You really go after weight when you start replacing platforms," Kuzak said.

Many of those platforms will be smaller - and originate in Europe, where fuel prices are always exorbitant, making attention to weight an omnipresent design factor.

Mark Fields, Ford's President of the Americas, said earlier this year that a high proportion of Ford's North American product offerings will be borrowed from its European operations. He said that by 2010, many Ford vehicles sold in the U.S. will share underpinnings with Ford of Europe models; by 2013, all will be shared. Currently, none are shared.

And weight reduction baked into new platforms will more easily pay dividends across numerous model ranges, as Ford eventually will cut back to nine global platforms from today's 25.

Kuzak also said the mid-term weight reductions will be enabled by a wide-ranging move to downsized engines with their output boosted by turbocharging. He said downsized engines deliver an obvious primary weight savings, but also generate tertiary reductions because many other components, such as suspension pieces, also can be reduced in size and weight once the engine is made lighter.

"It's all very synergistic," Kuzak said. "Once you get rolling, you'd be surprised."

Photo by Ford

Fiesta is one of several Europe-developed models Ford will deploy in the U.S. that use smaller engines and lighter platforms to help achieve ambitious sustainability goals.

Tuesday, December 16, 2008

US News Names 2009 Best Cars for the Money

Magazine partners with IntelliChoice to come up with 14 vehicles that will help you stretch your dollar.

Stretch Your Dollars

It’s always important to make your dollar go further, no matter what you’re buying. But when you purchase a big ticket item like a new vehicle, every percent you save is not just pennies or dollars; it can mean hundreds or even thousands of dollars in your pocket. That’s why the latest “Top” vehicle list from US News seems so timely to us here at Auto Credit Express.

To compile their list, U.S. News took their car rankings and combined this list with ownership data from IntelliChoice. The data includes a target price that consumers can expect to pay for the vehicle as well as their 5 year total cost of ownership data that’s reported by vehicle owners.

Here is what U.S. News had to say about the report:

“The auto industry has clearly been among the hardest hit by the economic downturn, but let’s not forget that car buyers are also struggling to make sense of a tumultuous market,” said Chad Smolinski, Vice President of Rankings & Reviews for U.S. News. “The Best Cars for the Money list recognizes vehicles that can be the most rewarding for car shoppers - namely those that win the most praise and offer the most compelling overall value.”

IntelliChoice had this to say about the list:

“Knowing the latest incentives, rebates, fuel costs, and projected resale values is as valuable and necessary as knowing a fair purchase price,” said James Bell, Editor of IntelliChoice.com. “Combining this information with editorial rankings provides a strong guidepost for those looking to purchase in today’s rapidly changing auto market.”

Here is what we say:

Picking out a car based on an IntelliChoice ranking is a little like asking for car buying advice from your accountant. You will undoubtedly be pleased with your bottom line during the vehicle’s ownership, but you might find the rest of your experience lacking. But if you combine this information with another metric – the overall driving experience as well as the style and substance of a vehicle – such as the 2009 Car Rankings by U.S. News, you should end up with a more well-rounded choice.

So if you’re looking for entertaining as well as bottom-line friendly vehicles, the folks at U.S. News hereby present the Best Cars for the Money award vehicles in 14 categories (along with a few of our comments):

Subcompact Cars
Honda Fit
(Comment: The benchmark of small cars, the second generation Fit also made Car and Driver Magazine’s 10 Best List as well)

Compact Cars
Hyundai Elantra
(Comment: The Elantra is a bit of a surprise, since the Honda Civic and Mazda3 are better performers and also hold resale value better)

Midsize Cars
Toyota Camry (includes Camry Hybrid)
(Comment: The best selling midsize sedan in the U.S., although the Camry has had recent issues with quality)

Full Size Cars
Toyota Avalon
(Comment: Although a bit bland for sporting tastes, the Avalon is best in class for quality and resale value)

Upscale Cars
Lexus ES
(Comment: It’s Lexus’ version of the Camry with wood, leather, and the great Lexus service experience)

Luxury Cars
Lexus GS (includes GS Hybrid)
(Comment: The GS offers a great ownership experience wrapped in bland styling. While not as much fun to drive, the hybrid will at least make you feel green.)

Sports Cars
Mazda Miata
(Comment: Although originally designed with the Lotus Elan in mind, the Miata has become a classic 2-seater in its own right.)

Compact Crossovers/SUVs
Mazda Mazda5
(Comment: Based on the Mazda3 platform, the 5 is one of the most spacious and versatile vehicles, for its size, available in the U.S.)

Midsize Crossovers/SUVs
Toyota Highlander (includes Highlander Hybrid)
(Comment: A bit bland, the Highlander seats 7 and has better –than-average resale value.)

Luxury Crossovers/SUVs
Lexus RX (includes RX Hybrid)
(Comment: Based on a front-wheel-drive platform, the RX delivers a car-like ride and Lexus quality and reliability.)

Full Size SUVs
Chevrolet Tahoe (includes Tahoe Hybrid)
(Comment: Given current rebates and incentives, the Tahoe is not only one of GM’s better vehicles, it’s also a relative bargain right now.)

Minivans
Toyota Sienna
(Comment: Along with the Honda Odyssey, the Sienna is at the top of the not-so-mini-anymore minivan class.)

Compact Pickups
Toyota Tacoma
(Comment: The Tacoma is the Toyota of compact pickups. Enough said.)

Full Size Pickups
Chevrolet Silverado
(Comment: The Silverado is something of a surprise on this list, as the new Ford F-150 would seem a better choice.)

The Bottom Line

While many of these vehicles hardly fall into the “frugal” category, they are all among the best buys in their respective segments and certainly represent good values for your vehicle dollar.

This entry was posted and is filed under New Cars. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Thursday, December 11, 2008

Car Wars: 10 Electric Car Lawsuits

Electric car makers take to the courtroom more often than the highway.

While the goal of most automakers is to make money making cars, it appears that electric car companies have another side pursuit—suing competitors. Is this all about the massive ego necessary to launch a car company? Or is it just something about electric cars? You be the judge. Here’s a rap sheet of high-profile lawsuits regarding electric and hybrid cars.

Tesla vs. Fisker



Fisker Karma plug-in hybrid.
Tesla and Fisker, two Western start-up electric car companies, are playing out a classic movie Western scene where one says, “This town’s not big enough for the both of us.” Here’s the synopsis: Tesla hires Fisker for design work on its second model. Fisker submits designs and is paid. Fisker starts own electric vehicle company. Tesla sues Fisker for submitting sub par design and stealing trade secrets. Pause for legal wrangling. Judge decides in favor of Fisker and arbiter awards Fisker $1.4 million in legal fees.

Vespremi, et al, vs. Tesla

David Vespremi.
Tesla’s former PR director, David Vespremi, filed a class-action lawsuit in July 2008, suing the company for “violating the terms of his employment, not acting in good faith, violating California labor codes, failing to pay wages owed, and practicing fraudulent business practices.” In addition, he sued for libel and slander because of remarks that Tesla execs made to the press after he was laid off. The suit doesn’t name the other members of the class. Claims will not exceed $75,000.

Magna vs. Tesla

Tesla Roadster's single-speed transmission.
Magna, a Canadian-based component supplier and engineering subcontractor to many automakers around the world, charged that Tesla asked the company to build a transmission for its electric roadster, which it delivered. But Tesla walked away without paying. Meanwhile, Magna says it will roll out its own plug-in car in 2010—but only in markets where its customers don’t sell cars.

The People vs. Michael Papp


Michael Papp, the head of another electric car startup, Spark EV, went to jail after being charged with failing to deliver 14 electric vehicles for which he was paid $100,000. His retort was that he was filing for bankruptcy—for the fourth time—but that the cars will still be delivered.

ZAP vs. DaimlerChrysler (as it was known at the time)

Smart ForTwo Crash Testing.
California-based ZAP, a company that sells variety of electric scooters, bikes and three-wheeled electric vehicles, wanted to be the first to bring Smart cars to the United States. Reuters reported in 2005 that ZAP ordered $1 billion worth of vehicles from Smart. DaimlerChrysler said it was unaware of the order. ZAP sued Daimler over what it termed “severe misconduct” and interference with ZAP’s business. The suit was initially thrown out of California’s lower courts, but Zap is appealling the case to the California Supreme Court.

Daimler vs. Ovonics vs. Japanese Battery Makers

Mercedes S400 Hybrid.
Ovonics Battery Company, a subsidiary of Energy Conversion Devices that eventually became Cobasys, filed lawsuits in 2001 against Matsushita Battery Industrial Co., Ltd., Toyota Motor Corp., Panasonic EV Energy Co., Ltd., and several related entities for patent infringement on its nickel metal hydride battery technology. Ovonics won the settlement, but found itself back in legal trouble in 2008, when Daimler AG, maker of Mercedes-Benz luxury cars, sued Cobasys for failing to provide hybrid battery packs as agreed for a planned Mercedes-Benz hybrid.

Boshart Engineering vs. Phoenix Motorcars

Phoenix Motorcars all-electric Sport Utility Truck.
For years, Phoenix Motorcars has been planning to sell an all-electric “sport utility truck,” using a Korean-built Ssanyong chassis. The company promises to deliver an electric SUV soon afterward. The company cut its ties with its motor supplier and engineering firm, Boshart Engineering. Boshart then sued Phoenix for reneging on its contract.

Toyota vs. Paice LLC

Toyota Prius.
In May 2008, the US Supreme Court allowed a lower court's ruling to stand which awards Paice LLC roughly $4.3 million in a patent lawsuit related to Toyota’s use of a microprocessor, which communicates information from the electric motor and internal combustion engine. Two other hybrid lawsuits with Toyota are pending, including one with Conrad Gardner, a 75-year-old Seattle-based engineer who filed a hybrid patent in the early 1990s. Gardner sued Toyota to, in his words, “to teach them a lesson to respect the patents of others.”

New York Taxicab Board vs. City of New York

Fisker Karma plug-in hybrid.
The Metropolitan Taxicab Board of Trade filed a suit against the City of New York claiming that Ford Escapes Hybrids mandated for use as taxis in the city were “unsafe” because they aren’t designed to be used as cabs.

Detroit vs. California

Crushed EV1s.
The biggest and most consequential lawsuits have been, and continue to be, filed by the big auto companies. In 2003, General Motors, DaimlerChrysler and Izusu Motors fought the State of California over its zero emission vehicle mandate, claiming it was an end run on the federal role of setting vehicle fuel economy standards. That one was settled out of court—but it led to the infamous “killing of the electric car.” Battles over emissions between Detroit, the State of California and the federal government continues to this day.
Lawsuits are so much a part of the landscape that the California Air Resources Board, the agency behind the zero emission vehicle mandate and many other regulations, has a standing item on its monthly agenda to discuss the status of various suits brought against it by the auto industry.

Import Cars Mob Russian Border

Want to see something else than always the same tired parking lot at Long Beach? Go to Russia, tovaritch!  There, car haulers are lining up for miles and miles and miles at the border. As reported yesterday, the Russians raised their car import duty to a prohibitive 30 percent, and whoever wanted to ship a car to Russia did it, before the new rate went into effect. Some at the end of the line didn’t quite make it.

Thursday, December 4, 2008

Obama's Transportation Secretary Must Be a Visionary

In the hierarchy of presidential Cabinet officials, the secretary of transportation is sort of like the brunette on Three's Company — you might recognize the name, but you can never quite place it.

That will almost certainly change under the Obama administration, which must repair the infrastructure crumbling beneath our feet. The president-elect has promised the nation's governors that he will invest heavily in roads, bridges, schools and other public projects. It's a wise move, because such spending is just the thing to reinvigorate our tanking economy.

The president-elect and his transportation secretary face a daunting list of issues. One of every four bridges nationwide is either structurally deficient or functionally obsolete. Bringing our drinking water infrastructure up to snuff will cost billions. Highway congestion eats up $78 billion annually through the 4.2 billion hours and 2.9 billion gallons of gasoline we waste sitting in traffic. "We have severe, serious infrastructure problems," David Mongan, president of the American Society of Civil Engineers, tells us. Fixing them will require $1.6 trillion over five years.

It will also take transportation secretary with vision. Obama hasn't said much about who might get the job, but the list of names being bandied about includes some top-notch candidates.


As you'd expect, several congressional lawmakers who serve on various transportation committees make the list, and they're well qualified for the job. They include Oregon Reps. Peter DeFazio, chair of the House Highways and Transit Subcommittee, and Earl Blumenauer. He's a former Portland public works commissioner and member of the House Transportation Committee who founded the Congressional Bike Caucus. Illinois Rep. Jerry Costello chairs the House Aviation Subcommittee and would be in a position to tackle our woeful air traffic control system. And we especially like Minnesota Rep. Jim Oberstar, who chairs the House Transportation Committee and moved quickly to secure funding to begin repairing the bridge that collapsed in Minneapolis last year.

Of course, appropriating money is different than spending it wisely, and it's not clear any members of Congress have the vision needed to address the challenges ahead. For that, President-Elect Obama might do better to look to state transportation officials. People like New York Transportation Commissioner Janette Sadik-Kahn, New York City Councilman John Liu or Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell would bring the government experience, ground-level perspective and progressive thinking the Department of Transportation needs to move forward. Any of them would do a fine job.

That said, the best guy for the job may well be R.T. Rybak, the forward-thinking mayor of Minneapolis. He's made sensible and sustainable transportation policy a hallmark of his tenure. His Access Minneapolis transportation plan calls for bringing streetcars back to the city, building a robust pedestrian network, increasing transit access and capacity and making city streets more bike-friendly. When the Minneapolis bridge collapsed, he insisted that its replacement have the capacity to support light rail. His progressive transportation policies have nearly doubled the number of cyclists and, more impressive, made downtown Minneapolis one of the few urban areas to return to the population levels it saw before the flight to the suburbs that followed World War II.

His is exactly the kind of proactive, big-picture thinking we need if we are to address our nation's infrastructure problems and begin moving us toward smarter growth. It doesn't hurt that he's also the only big city U.S. mayor who's ever been seen crowd surfing.

Rybak, Liu and Sadik-Kahn certainly aren't safe, conventional choices. But safe and conventional won't solve America's transportation challenges.

Photo by Flickr user kmf221.

Lancia: the relaunch is off

The Fiat Group’s plan to reintroduce its premium brand Lancia to the UK market next year has been postponed indefinitely.

“Given the current global economic crisis, Fiat Auto has taken the decision to delay the reintroduction of the Lancia brand in right-hand-drive markets beyond 2009,” said Fiat in a statement.

A Fiat UK company insider told Autocar there was no new schedule in place for a later UK roll-out either.



“Right now it would be ill-advised to commit to a date on any relaunch of Lancia in Britain.”

Our source went on to suggest that the new £20k-plus Delta was simply the wrong car for the moment, and that relaunching the Lancia brand with it now “just wouldn’t make sense.”

He insisted that work would continue behind the scenes to bring more UK dealers onboard for a potential reintroduction. “Our work to prepare the ground for Lancia to come back won’t be wasted. We simply have to wait for things to get better.”

When asked if the UK roll-out would now be timed to coincide with the arrival of the new Ypsilon supermini, which could begin right-hand drive production in early 2010, the insider told Autocar that “all things are possible.”

The source wasn’t aware whether any Lancia deposits had been taken by dealers for UK deliveries of the new Delta in 2009, but insisted that any that had woud be returned.

Recall Alert: 18,816 GM Crossovers

GM has issued a recall for 18,816 of its vehicles due to a missing rivet in the second- or third-row seat belts, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. In the event of an accident, the missing rivet could cause the buckle to separate from the mounting strap, a potentially dangerous failure.
Affected vehicles include the Buick Enclave, Chevrolet Traverse, GMC Acadia and Saturn Outlook, all from the 2009 model year.


An additional 2,149 Saturn Vues are also being recalled due to an incorrect steering knuckle. Though only a small number of vehicles are affected, if both the left and right steering knuckles fail it could lead to a loss of control of the vehicle.

Dealers will inspect all models for the missing rivet, and if not found they will replace it. Owners can contact NHTSA's hotline at 888-327-4236, or the different brands at the following numbers:

Buick, 866-608-8080
Chevrolet, 800-630-2438
GMC, 866-996-9463
Saturn, 800-972-8876

Wednesday, December 3, 2008

L-driver blames herself for death: court

A NSW coroner's recommendation that tips for L-Plate supervisors be printed in log books has been welcomed by the mother of a woman killed by a learner driver.

The mother of a young woman killed when a learner driver ploughed into a bus queue has welcomed a NSW coroner's recommendation that tips for L-Plate supervisors be printed in their log books.

Fashion student Emma Hansen, 20, was killed and 11 others were injured when Rose Deng mistook the accelerator for the brake during a driving lesson in Sydney's south in March 2007.

Her car mounted the kerb at Railway Parade at Kogarah and slammed into a queue of people waiting for a bus.

A charge of negligent driving occasioning death against Ms Deng, 42, was conditionally dismissed in January this year under the Mental Health Act.

In his findings, Deputy State Coroner Malcolm MacPherson said Ms Deng's car "swept down the footpath like a Tsunami", likening the devastation left in its wake to that of a terrorist attack.

"It is difficult, if not impossible, to put into words the horror of that moment," Mr MacPherson told Glebe Coroner's Court on Wednesday.

"The various photos taken at the scene show the carnage that resulted - bodies strewn about, bus signals flattened, empty prams crushed - a scene more like that seen after a terrorist attack."

Mr MacPherson recommended that guidelines for learner driver supervisors - which are currently available on the Roads and Traffic Authority's (RTA) website - be included in the learner driver's log book used to record every lesson.

The RTA's lawyer, Chris Ronalds SC, said the authority was "more than happy" to adopt the recommendation and include the guidelines in the next print run, due in three or four months time.

Speaking outside the inquest, Ms Hansen's mother Lynne Hansen said she was satisfied by the outcome, even though no one had been held accountable for her daughter's death.

"I don't see how anything else really could have come out of it," she told reporters.

The findings would "probably" bring her family some closure, she said, adding that printing guidelines into the log book could help prevent similar accidents.

"I think if you are a mum or a dad you do tend to look through (the log book) fairly carefully," Mrs Hansen said.

"...anything that can help this not happen again is a good thing."

The first step was to warn parents to teach their children how to perform an emergency brake "before they do anything", she said.

Emma would be remembered as a "gorgeous, vibrant young woman who had the world at her feet" and loved her family above everything else, Ms Hansen said.

Earlier in the day, lawyer Mark Ierace said Ms Deng still "blamed herself to the point of significant psychological harm".

"(After the accident) she literally pulled her hair out - there were clumps of it found on the road," he said.

"She punched her face, she threw her head against the ground - to the extent that the police had to take the extraordinary step of restraining her."

The inquest was told the African immigrant, who endured torture in her Sudanese homeland before arriving in Australia in 1994, had an unspecified long-term "mental condition" which was exacerbated by the crash.

She is undergoing psychiatric treatment and did not appear before the inquest.

Monday, December 1, 2008

Toyota to lift prices in January

A weaker Australian dollar will force Toyota Australia to lift prices across its imported vehicle range in January, the company says.

The company said prices would rise by an average of 2.4 per cent, adding about $500 to a budget Yaris model but more than $3,700 to top-of-the-range Landcruiser Sahara.

The only models spared the price hikes will be Toyota's locally built Camry and Aurion cars.

Toyota's senior executive director of sales and marketing, David Buttner, said the price increases were forced by a dramatic fall in the value of the Australian dollar.

"The Australian dollar has weakened against the yen by more than 35 per cent in the past three months," Mr Buttner said on Tuesday.

"The current rate is more than 20 per cent below the long-term average of around 79 yen and we do not expect it to recover to any great degree in the near future.

"In the past year, there have also been steep increases in the prices of raw materials, such as steel.

"In the light of all these pressures, we believe the increase of 2.4 per cent from the start of the new year is extremely modest."

Mr Buttner said the locally built cars had been protected from the price increases as a strong show of support for the Australian manufacturing operations from Toyota's Japanese parent.

Despite uncertainty in credit markets, Mr Buttner said Toyota buyers could be confident that financing was available.

"Almost 85 per cent of Toyota dealers source credit through Toyota Finance, whose debt is rated Triple A by (rating agencies) Standard & Poor's and Moody's," he said.

"The rest of our network also has solid arrangements in place with large Australian or global institutions."

Tuesday, November 25, 2008

Editorial: GM Death Watch 219: GM Prepackaged Reorganization

In recent congressional testimony GM admits that its’ experts are exploring the chapter 11 reorganization option, but GM argues that chapter 11 causes too many  problems, including projected damage to the overall economy and to jobs dependent on auto manufacturing. Others argue that  reorganization  is needed, but should somehow take place outside of the time-tested  legal process known as chapter 11.  Sentiment is growing that a “prepackaged” chapter 11 case financed by taxpayers is the best way to solve both the business and financial problems of GM, and perhaps of other automakers.

What is a prepackaged chapter 11?

In a true“pre-packaged” reorganization the debtor proposes its reorganization plan and solicits votes before the chapter 11 case is filed. For companies with publicly traded debt and other securities, the advantage of a chapter 11 is that the debtor can restructure its debts without the holdout problem posed by exchange offers, while at the same time reducing delay and expense. A partial “prepack” involves a pre-petition solicitation only of certain classes of creditors (e.g., bondholders in the case of GM) and a post-filing solicitation of other classes of creditors, say unsecured suppliers to GM.  Pre-filing voting on the reorganization plan is not essential if the parties have agreed in writing on how their claims will be treated under the plan, sometimes called a “pre-negotiated” prepack. A prepack does not have to immediately address every issue of every creditor group, and frequently smaller claims are resolved after a chapter 11 plan is approved. A chapter 11 filing also avoids the problem  and delay caused by soliciting shareholder votes, since  under a GM reorganization plan the common shareholders should receive nothing and therefore do not get to vote.

A prepackaged reorganization is not ideal for companies that must still undergo substantial changes to their operations or if the debtor seeks to terminate large numbers of unprofitable or burdensome contracts. However, GM’s restructuring/downsizing has been underway for a few years, plant closings are being implemented, employee layoffs have been accelerated, and GM is already making the necessary changes to address market realities.

A big advantage of chapter 11 is that the debtor can quickly and easily sell assets and operating divisions (e.g. Hummer, AC Delco) to create cash for ongoing operations, since the claims of persons affected by the sale are all funneled into the bankruptcy court for expedited resolution and the existence of disputes need not delay the sales. Pre-negotiated asset sales can be completed in a few weeks after a case is commenced, creating immediate cash for operations.

Why is a non-bankruptcy loan to GM a poor use of taxpayer money?

A lender to an insolvent company on the verge of bankruptcy wants its loan to be repaid and would not let loan proceeds be used to pay off existing liabilities. GM owes unsecured bondholders about $40 billion, and there is no indication that bondholders have agreed to standstill, waive interest payments, or to restructure the debt. GM’s Series D debt of $800 million comes due in June 2009, when GM must pay the debt, default or get bondholders to extend the maturity date. GM owes trade creditors about $28 billion and owes another $$34 billion in accrued expenses.

The legal obligations of GM to bondholders and trade creditors cannot be changed or modified without a bankruptcy case, or the written consent of each individual creditor, a near impossible task. Attempting to reorganize GM outside of a legal proceeding would  encourage  creditors to holdouts for special treatment, and delay any chance at restructuring

A commercial lender asked to support GM (which is insolvent on the basis of its balance sheet) would ask how paying the existing claims of bondholders and suppliers will help GM with its current cash flow problems, and would not consent to its loan proceeds being diverted to unsecured creditors.  Without a chapter 11 case, taxpayer loans to GM could be used to pay interest on $40 billion of GM unsecured debt, and to pay the $800 million Series D debt coming due in June 2009. GM also must pay $7.5 billion to the retiree trust in January 2010, another liability it does not have funds to pay. Taxpayer money should not be used to bailout existing debt or to pay non-essential existing liabilities. The restructuring of GM’s payment obligations can be most quickly and effectively accomplished in a pre-packaged chapter 11 case.

What is involved in preparing a business plan and application for a chapter 11 “debtor-in-possession” loan?

In a prepackaged chapter 11 reorganization, the financing for the chapter 11 debtor is arranged and in place before the chapter 11 case is filed. The financing often includes a commitment to provide the “exit” financing which is used to fund the debtor’s obligations when its chapter 11 reorganization plan is approved by creditors and by the bankruptcy court. Given the current state of commercial credit markets, in GM’s situation the US Treasury probably will have to make the commitment for the reorganization plan exit financing. The reorganization plan will set forth the repayment terms for the existing secured debt, the new US Treasury loan and the Department of Energy (DOE) loan.

As with any loan application, the starting point for GM will be its current assets and liabilities, its cash flow and its realistic projections, all of which go into a measured calculation as to the borrower’s credit worthiness and ability to repay the loan, with interest. In chapter 11 cases the debtor prepares extremely detailed projections and budgets, taking into account the reduction in its current liabilities that result when the case is filed. For example, after the chapter 11 case is filed GM will no longer pay  interest  or principal  on its unsecured debt. Chapter 11 lets GM stop paying liabilities incurred before the chapter 11 case is filed, thereby increasing cash available for operations.  All these deferrals and changes to current liabilities are then reflected in the debtor’s cash flow projections.

How will retiree claims be treated in a pre-packaged chapter 11 case?

GM retiree claims primarily are unsecured claims, having the same priority as bondholders and other unsecured creditors. In January 2010 the UAW and its related retiree trust will assume most of GM’s retiree liabilities for current retirees.  In January 2010 GM has to pay the retiree trust $7.5 billion in cash and other transfers of assets. The trust also receives a $4.4 billion GM convertible debt issue which is an unsecured claim against GM. Over ensuing years GM must pay the trust additional amounts estimated to be between $10 billion to $17 billion. A basic rule of bankruptcy is that claims having the same priority in payment get the same treatment under a chapter 11 reorganization plan. Thus, all unsecured claims, including claims of the retiree trust, should get the same treatment. In a pre-packaged chapter 11 case it is possible for creditors to agree on different treatment of claims having the same priority, but this invariably leads to more delay and expense.. . In a GM chapter 11 case these future payments to retirees are frozen, and are treated as unsecured claims, which means they will get a distribution under the GM reorganization plan.

What happens at the beginning of a pre-packaged chapter 11 case?

Despite assertions that reorganization in chapter 11 is not a realistic option, a company with pre-arranged financing is quite able to operate in chapter 11.  In nearly every mega case where a restructuring of an operating business is contemplated, the bankruptcy court enters “first day orders” which are basically all the court approvals that the business in chapter 11 needs to continue to operate its business in the ordinary course. First day orders deal with everything from financing, to advance payments, approval of bank accounts, authority to honor customer warranty claims, and reimburse dealers—all the details needed to prevent disruption of the operating business. While it is definitely a lot of paperwork, legal and turnaround professionals do this type of work every day, and the courts routinely approve first day orders designed to save operating businesses.

GM’s assertion that millions of jobs will be “lost” ignores the simple fact that companies continue to operate their businesses while in chapter 11, albeit under a great deal of scrutiny.  GM already finances its largest suppliers (Delphi and American Axle) and has a receivable financing program for other suppliers so that the suppliers have access to cash. These programs can continue in chapter 11, or even be improved. For example, GM could ask the reorganization court to approve cash pre-payments to essential suppliers. The past due claims of suppliers are unsecured claims and in bankruptcy have the same priority in payment as GM’s unsecured debt. In planning a prepack it is not unusual for the debtor, with the consent of its major creditors, to prepay critical suppliers before the prepack is filed.

What will creditors get in a pre-packaged GM reorganization plan?

A GM reorganization plan must be based on a realistic projection of future profitability, because these future cash flows will be used to determine the enterprise value of the reorganized company, and hence the value of new common shares which will be distributed under the plan.  Fortunately for taxpayers, in a chapter 11 case the debtors’ financial projects are open to public scrutiny and to the comments and objections of creditors affected by the chapter 11 plan.

GM will not have resources to make a cash distribution to creditors, so the reorganization plan will involve a distribution of newly issued debt and new common stock, with the old debt and old common shares being extinguished. The new common stock will be listed on a national exchange and will have an immediately ascertainable value based on the financial projections that GM will have to produce to get creditor approval of its chapter 11 plan. Under the reorganization plan the trust for retirees should not receive payment on the  $4.0 billion short term note,  the $4.4 billion long term note, or its other claims against GM, but will get its pro rata share of the newly issued debt and common stock of reorganized GM. Since the new common stock will be publicly traded, it can be sold to fund retiree obligations assumed by the retiree trust. In a chapter 11 case creditors can also agree that retirees will get better treatment than is customary, but this requires a vote of creditors and special treatment is likely to be contentious and delay any chapter 11 case.

Government financing for a GM pre-packaged reorganization

A US Treasury non-bankruptcy equity investment in GM (i.e., purchase of GM preferred stock), is surely a bad investment for a company already balance sheet insolvent by more than $60 billion. A primary beneficiary of an equity type investment would be the existing unsecured bondholders and unsecured creditors, who would have a claim on the proceeds. Others suggest that taxpayers make an unsecured loan, but such a loan would have the same priority as the other $105 billion of existing GM liabilities, making loan repayment unlikely.  Taxpayers should demand that any loan made to GM be made only in connection with GM’s chapter 11 filing, that it be fully secured, and only disbursed pursuant to detailed written budgets. Naturally, lenders to chapter 11 debtors insist on competent management, but also hire their own accountants and reorganization professionals so that the lender has an independent analysis and opinion of the debtor’s viability, business plans and the achievability of the debtor’s goals and financial projections.

In a pre-arranged chapter 11 case, the US Treasury could extend to GM a secured debtor-in-possession line of credit for say $40 billion, a line of credit secured by a first security interest on all GM assets, being junior only to GM’s existing secured line of credit of $4.4 billion.  A portion of the US Treasury line of credit should be available to support essential suppliers through loans, letters of credit and pre-payments. On the first day of a pre-packaged chapter 11case the bankruptcy court is likely to give interim approval to a portion  of the total credit line and have a hearing ten days later to approve the balance of the loan facility.

Since the government lacks experience in administering secured loans to insolvent companies in chapter 11 reorganization, it might be preferable to have the loan guaranteed by the US Treasury, but funds would be advanced periodically by a consortium of financial institutions experienced in lending to chapter 11 debtors, and able to monitor day to day compliance, with the terms and covenants of the  loan. This would not eliminate oversight by the US Treasury and Congress, but the details of loan administration would be delegated to experts.

GM’s Chapter 11 reorganization plan can be expedited

Given the importance of US automakers to the economy and the need for a successful reorganization to preserve jobs, a GM chapter 11 reorganization case will be expedited. The chief judge can assign multiple judges to handle different aspects of the case, recognizing that speed is essential to a successful reorganization. Bondholders and other creditors should support expedited handling of their claims because a successful reorganization is the best way for creditors to realize value.

A pre-packaged plan can be approved quickly because the plan has been negotiated and accepted by creditors entitled to vote before the chapter 11 case is begun. In a partial “pre-pack”, the largest creditor groups informally approve the general principles of the plan before the case is filed, but formal solicitation and voting take place under the supervision of the bankruptcy court. By using accelerated schedules a  prepack can be accomplished in months, not years. Pre-filing negotiations over the terms of the reorganization plan often result in agreement on difficult issues—payments to suppliers, support for the dealer network, honoring customer warranty claims, and even changes to employee work rules and benefits, and all of these agreements can be rapidly documented.

Treatment of claims and shareholders under a GM reorganization plan

Given GM’s own statements about its shortage of cash for the foreseeable future, it is unlikely that GM would make any cash distributions to existing creditors. Cash will be needed to retool plants, complete ongoing restructuring efforts, and to reassure trade creditors that enough cash is available so that trade creditors will extend new trade credit to GM.

Under a reorganization plan, creditors and shareholders are put in classes, with creditors having the same priority in payment often grouped in the same class. A simple GM reorganization plan would have the following elements:

-Taxpayers have a $40 billion first lien on all GM assets for monies lent by the US Treasury and the DOE.  If GM’s debtor in possession financing cannot be refinanced by commercial banks, then taxpayers will finance GM’s exit from chapter 11. Taxpayers should get warrants for  10 % of GM’s new common shares to reward them for the risk of financing GM in Chapter 11.
-GM’s existing $4.4 billion secured line of credit will retain its lien on GM’s assets and be extended.
-Consumer warranty claims are expressly assumed under the chapter 11 plan.
-$40 billion of unsecured bondholder debt will receive its  pro rata share of any new unsecured debt issued by GM and a pro rata share of GM’s new common shares.  The common shares will trade on the public market and will have an immediately realizable value. No interest will be paid on any new debt until all taxpayer loans to GM are paid in full, with interest
-Trade payables of  about $39 billion, the $17 to $27 billion owed to the retiree trust,  and any other unsecured claims, also get their pro rata share of any new debt and new common shares.
-The retiree trust may merit special treatment, although potential future liabilities to the trust of $27 billion not only would weigh heavily on GM’s post reorganization success, but also would depress the market value of any new common shares issued by GM. With creditor consent, the retiree trust could receive subordinated debt, with future maturity dates timed to GM’s future profitability. Without access to GM’s cash flow projections, it is hard to suggest what treatment would be fair to retirees while still protecting GM’s other creditors.
-Old common shares do not vote on the plan, get no distribution, and are canceled. Existing stock options are eliminated
-A new board of directors selected by creditors is in charge of reorganized GM, with board representation for the major creditor constituencies.

GM’s Hypothetical Post-Reorganization Balance sheet

Projected Assets: $90 billion

Estimated Liabilities
$4.4 billion: existing secured line of credit
$10 billion: secured term note to US Treasury
$12 billion: secured term note to the Department of Energy (GM’s share of the     DOE funds for alternative vehicles)
$1 billion:  trust or secured letter of credit established to guarantee payment of     consumer warranty claims
$2 billion: current tax liabilities

Subtotal: $29.4 billion of secured and priority claims

$9 billion: accrual for consumer product warranty liability
$10 billion: for current claims arising in during the chapter 11 case which will be     paid by GM in the ordinary course of business
$5 billion:  new unsecured debt (payment in kind) set aside for miscellaneous     claims, with maturities deferred and no cash interest payment
$5 billion: subordinated debt, issued with laddered maturity dates timed to fund     the retiree trust only if it runs out of money in the future
$15 billion: accrual for  pension and retirement obligations for current employees
$5 billion: leases and other obligations, including liabilities to foreign subsidiaries

Subtotal: $39 billion of unsecured debt and unsecured liabilities

Total estimated liabilities: $78.4 billion

Equity distribution
90% of newly issued GM common shares distributed to bondholders, the retiree     trust, and other unsecured creditors
10% of new equity reserved for the US Treasury

Final thoughts on labor, management and Detroit

The UAW represents labor in negotiations with GM management. GM’s management, not labor, has been behind the GM steering wheel as GM went over the Cliff of Insolvency. UAW negotiators are tough, well-informed professionals. The UAW is not inflexible; witness its recent agreement to defer $1.7 billion of payments to the retiree trust, a deferral which has helped GM stay alive. The UAW has its own staff of accountants and restructuring professionals who are prepared to sit down and negotiate and help GM propose a viable reorganization plan

GM’s board of directors, its management and the UAW have made mistakes, but their serious efforts to restructure GM should not be doubted. Rick Wagoner has spent 30 years at GM, but his efforts have been overtaken by circumstances. In reorganization the board will be replaced, as will some of the operations managers and senior executives. Undue criticism of GM’s management and the UAW distracts from the need to urgently develop and implement a viable pre-packaged reorganization plan. GM’s management needs to get down to business and develop a reorganization plan that will protect taxpayers and earn the support of Congress.

GM’s chapter 11 case should be filed in Detroit. The birthplace of the American auto industry should be the place of GM’s rebirth.

Sunday, November 23, 2008

FORD OFFERS BRAND NEW BONUS INCENTIVE FOR FUEL-EFFICIENT VEHICLES PLUS EMPLOYEE PRICING

DEARBORN, Mich., Nov. 18, 2008 – Ford is offering a first-ever bonus incentive tied to fuel-efficient vehicles, extending an extra benefit to customers beyond “Employee Pricing Plus” deals it’s already offering across its 2009 Ford, Lincoln and Mercury vehicle lineup.

Customers who buy one of the company’s nine most fuel-efficient Ford, Lincoln or Mercury vehicles will be offered the bonus incentive of 0 percent financing from Ford Credit for 36 months in addition to Employee Pricing.  The fuel-efficient vehicles include:
  • Ford Focus, delivering up to 35 mpg: The sporty small car comes equipped with a standard 2.0-liter, I-4 Duratec 20 engine producing 140 horsepower and mated to a five-speed manual transmission or a four-speed automatic transmission.
  • Ford Fusion, up to 29 mpg: The current model of this mid-size car is a leader in driving dynamics, offering up 29 mpg on the highway, with the front-wheel-drive Fusion’s 2.3-liter, four-cylinder engine.
  • Ford Escape, up to 28 mpg:  Equipped with a new 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine, six-speed automatic transmission and front-wheel drive, Ford Escape delivers best-in-class fuel economy in the small SUV segment with 28 mpg highway/20 mpg city.
  • Ford Flex, to up 24 mpg:  With front-wheel drive, the Ford Flex offers unsurpassed fuel economy in its segment – up to 24 mpg on the highway.  Even with standout fuel economy, Flex offers creature comforts and room for up to seven passengers.
  • Mercury Milan, up to 29 mpg:  Mercury’s most fuel-efficient car delivers up to 29 mpg on the highway, courtesy of it 2.3-liter, four-cylinder engine.
  • Mercury Mariner, up to 28 mpg:  New, 171 hp, 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine with intake variable cam timing enhances fuel economy and performance, gaining 2 mpg in highway fuel economy when equipped with the new six-speed transmission.
  • >Lincoln MKZ, up to 28 mpg:  Equipped with Duratec 3.5-liter V-6 engine, the Lincoln MKZ features a premium six-speed automatic transmission with standard electronic stability control.
  • Lincoln MKS, up to 24 mpg:  Powered by a new 3.7-liter V-6 engine, this Lincoln MKS powertrain has been derived from the proven 3.5-liter V-6 found in the Lincoln MKX and MKZ, which was voted one of Ward’s 10-Best Engines for 2007 – and delivering fuel economy among the best in its class.
  • New F-150, up to 21 mpg:  Unsurpassed fuel economy in the full-size pickup segment delivering up to 21 miles per gallon highway with F-150 SFE “superior fuel economy” edition. 
Note: 2009  F-150 not included in the “Employee Pricing Plus” program – but is eligible for the special 0 percent financing offer tied to the company’s most fuel-efficient models.
“Ford is bullish on fuel economy,” said Ken Czubay, Ford’s vice president of Sales and Marketing.  “Each new and significantly freshened vehicle we’ve brought to market in the past year has the best or among the best fuel economy in its segment, and we want to provide customers an extra reason to drive one of these high-quality, fuel-efficient cars, crossovers and trucks.”

The Plan
Beginning Wednesday and running through Jan. 5, Ford, Lincoln and Mercury are making their highly prized employee discount pricing even more attractive through the “Employee Pricing Plus” program.
The special incentive not only offers customers employee pricing on most 2008 and 2009 Ford, Lincoln Mercury models but will additionally offer up to $6,000 cash back.   Alternatively, if customers select one of Ford’s most fuel-efficient vehicles, they will have the option for 0 percent financing for 36 months.  For example:

Model
2009 Ford Focus
Plus Customer Cash

OR
2009 Ford Focus
Plus 0% Financing
MSRP
$16,505
$16,505
Employee Price
$15,149
$15,149
Less Customer Cash
$1,000
N/A
FMCC Bonus Cash
$500.00
$500.00
Ford Employee Price Plus
$13,649
$14,649

Excluded from the Employee Pricing Plus plan are 09MY F-150, 08/09MY Escape/Mariner Hybrids, 08/09MY Shelby GT500, F-Series chassis cabs models and E-Series cutaways models. 

“Now is the best time to buy one of our Ford, Lincoln or Mercury vehicles,” says Czubay.  “The Ford Employee Pricing Plus program offers customers an unparalleled value on Ford’s fuel-efficient, technology-leading, high-quality lineup.”

Chinese plug-in electric hybrid sedan will probably launch in the United States by 2010

 In this far corner of China’s manufacturing heartland, Gov. Ted Kulongoski’s dream of making Oregon home to America’s green car movement is about to roll off the assembly lines.

At BYD Auto Co., China’s fast-growing automotive star, a plug-in electric hybrid sedan is just weeks from meeting millions of Chinese consumers. The F3DM, which runs up to 80 miles on a single charge and packs a 7-gallon tank, will probably launch in the United States by 2010.

Kulongoski, who clinched a deal last week to bring Nissan’s pure-electric cars to Oregon, is vying for BYD’s bid for a North American pilot site. On Friday, he met with BYD President and Chairman Wang Chuanfu at the company’s mammoth headquarters nearly two hours from China’s booming industrial zone.

“We’re hoping to build a critical mass,” Kulongoski said. “We’re laying the infrastructure and hoping to bring change at home by reducing greenhouse gases. The most logical place to move toward is electric autos.”

On a 10-day business trip in Asia, Kulongoski has trumpeted Oregon’s status as the No. 1 hybrid market in the country and promoted an ambitious vision to automakers in Japan and China: electric charging stations every 60 miles along interstates. Tax incentives for Oregonians to buy electric cars. And tax bonuses for drivers to build car chargers in their garages.

If Oregon is successful in claiming a stake in the world’s emerging electric car industry, ripples across many other sectors could provide a boost to the state’s economy, hurt by the departure of Freightliner and other manufacturers.

Patrick Reiten, president of Pacific Power, said there will be growth — and challenges — in meeting the power supply needs that come with electric cars. Pacific Power is owned by Warren Buffett’s MidAmerican Energy Holdings Company, which in September bought a 10 percent stake in BYD for about $230 million — a relationship Kulongoski hopes will help nudge BYD to Oregon.

Bill Wyatt, executive director of the Port of Portland, has met with BYD executives several times. The Port is a major gateway for Japanese and South Korean cars, with about 450,000 Toyotas, Hyundais and Hondas arriving last year. Wyatt said the Port has courted Chinese carmakers in preparation for the flood of Chinese autos expected to hit the U.S. in coming years.

“Eventually, one of these Chinese car manufacturers is going to begin large-scale exports to the United States,” Wyatt said. “Whoever it is, we’ve gotten to know them at this point. When they do, we want to talk to them.”

BYD, which could be the nation’s first introduction to Chinese-made autos, plans to open five test market sites worldwide, including in Israel, Denmark and Hong Kong. Though company executives have yet to finalize any decisions, Portland and Los Angeles are at the top of the list.

“We have to look at the market to see how people will respond first,” said Henry Li, general manager of BYD’s auto export trade division. “We’re a newcomer. So we have to have a new strategy.”

Build Your Dreams
BYD has been in the auto business only five years, but bold expansion and innovation have helped the company live up to its name — Build Your Dreams.

“For a company like us, we’re bold enough to try anything new,” Li said. “Give us some time, and we’ll make it happen.”

In 1995, BYD started with about $300,000 and 20 employees, pumping out batteries for cell phones. Today, the company makes 60 percent of the world’s nickel-cadmium rechargeable batteries used in products such as tools and toothbrushes. It makes 30 percent of the world’s lithium-ion batteries in cell phones, not to mention countless other components for companies such as Motorola, Nokia and Samsung. The company now has seven plants across China, which employ a labor force of 130,000 — and growing.

“We are experts in the battery market,” Li said. “We have the know-how and the process down. We make the safest batteries in the world. We have never had a recall.”

This expertise in batteries is at the heart of BYD’s strategy for taking over the auto industry, which it entered in 2003 after purchasing a government-owned auto plant. In a short time, BYD has become a top seller in China. Currently, BYD makes five models of fuel-powered sedans and hatchbacks, ranging from $8,000 to $20,000.

For its electric cars, BYD developed a lithium-ion battery that uses iron. Using iron brings down the cost of the battery and offers a life cycle of up to 10years — five times a cell phone battery, Li said. The F3DM, BYD’s plug-in electric hybrid, will allow drivers to run on electricity and gas, seamlessly switching between the two. It boasts extremely low emissions, plugs into a household socket and can go 300 miles on a full tank and a full charge. The company has yet to set a price, but estimates range upward of $20,000.

The company is developing a purely electric vehicle that it plans to launch to Chinese consumers in 2009, Li said. It will be a matter of time before the E6, a full-size sedan that seats five, arrives in the U.S. In the company’s glossy showroom, a sign calls the car “Faddy, Faithworthy and Futuramic.”

“The hybrid is a good introductory product,” Li said. “Until electric vehicles are more popular, the charging stations don’t exist. This will allow people to drive farther without worrying about it.”

Workers live on campus
In a compound that sprawls four square miles, BYD headquarters in the lush and mountainous region of Pingshan, Shenzhen, offers a glimpse of a company with a serious competitive advantage — an edge that many Chinese companies maintain over their U.S. rivals.

An army of 30,000 workers lives on a campus the size of a small city. Dozens of dormitories tower dozens of floors above ground. Unlike its U.S. counterparts, BYD relies on human labor in an industry that has shifted to automation.

“The big difference here,” Kulongoski said, “is the process of manufacturing is so much hand labor. There’s not so much of the robotics that we saw in Japan. It’s mostly people, lots of young people.”

Rather than buy expensive machines, BYD has held down prices by relying on manual labor — which in the United States is usually a company’s largest expense. BYD workers’ wages start at 1,000 Chinese yuan a month, or about $150 U.S., said Elva Zhai, 24, a sales assistant in the export trade department. The workday is from 8:30 a.m. to 5p.m.

The company provides free housing, but the cost of three meals a day — provided at the cavernous cafeteria — come out of their salary for an unnoticeable amount. On Friday at lunch, thousands of employees, wearing stylish jeans, T-shirts and BYD lanyards line up for a dozen varieties of meat, vegetables, rice and soup. Zhai swipes her employee badge; she doesn’t know the exact cost of each meal.

“It’s very little,” said Zhai, who moved two years ago from her hometown of Xi’an, a city where BYD runs a plant. She holds a degree in international economics, and working at BYD feels a lot like being in college, she said.

With most of their costs covered, workers are able to save a fair bit of money, Zhai said. She and her friends sometimes go downtown to sing in the karaoke clubs or go shopping. Workers have 10 days of vacation each year, and they come from across China to work at BYD. The company offers housing for entire families and builds sports fields on-site. It also runs schools for employees’ children and has a technical school where many of BYD’s 11,000 engineers come from.

Zhai’s dream car is an F3R, BYD’s stylish coupe, though she admits she has little use for a car. Still, she yearns to buy a blue one, like the one on display in the company’s showroom.

“In China, cars are still a luxury item,” Zhai said. “But everyone has a cell phone.”

oregonlive

Friday, November 21, 2008

World’s Biggest Automakers Detail Ambitious Electric-car Plans

  Many of the world’s biggest automakers on Wednesday detailed ambitious electric-car plans that promise zero emissions but will demand patience from consumers and subsidies from governments to succeed.

Nissan Motor Co, BMW’s BMWG.DE MINI, General Motors Corp and Volkswagen’s Audi were among the automakers who promised, at the Los Angeles auto show, to bring electric cars to market in the next few years.

Consumers have been clamoring for greener vehicles amid soaring gasoline prices and increased concerns about global warming. The costly batteries required to power gas-free electric cars, however, are not powerful enough to deliver the long driving range car buyers are accustomed to.

“It’s going to be a tough sell,” said David Champion, director of auto testing for Consumer Reports. “People are used to buying their cars and being able to take them anywhere they want. There are a lot of hurdles for electric vehicles.”

Of the cars unveiled at the show, the first one consumers will be able to drive is the Mini E, an all-electric Mini Cooper that will hit U.S. roads next year. The plug-in car will have a range of 156 miles before it needs recharging.

Initially, only 500 Mini E vehicles will be available in two markets - California and New York - so the company can gather details on their performance.

They will only be available for lease, for $850 a month.

BMW executives said that despite being all-electric, the Mini E would be as peppy and fun to drive as cars with traditional combustion engines.

Other automakers echoed that concern, saying the car’s performance was paramount.

“As a responsible manufacturer we have to look at what the Audi interpretation of electric drive will be and you will see this in the near future,” said Peter Schwarzenbauer, a board member of Audi, which is also working on an electric car. “The car would be extremely good looking and you will have a lot of fun driving it — despite what’s going on underneath.”

Nissan and General Motors both have electric vehicles they plan to sell to consumers, beginning in 2010.

Nissan has yet to unveil its all-electric vehicle, but the company projected that about 10 percent of global vehicle sales by 2020 will be electric cars, equivalent to roughly 7 million units in annual sales.

But Chief Executive Carlos Ghosn conceded that a lot of uncertainty surrounds that forecast. “Whatever number I give you is going to be wrong,” Ghosn said. “The reality is today there are zero electric cars on the market.”

In order to jump-start demand for the zero-emission vehicles, governments at the national, state and city levels need to help provide incentives and establish infrastructure for electric recharging, Ghosn said.

Nissan has clinched tie-ups with governments in Japan, Israel, Denmark and Portugal as well as the U.S. states of Tennessee and, most recently, Oregon.

Under the automaker’s new deal with Oregon, Nissan agreed to provide zero-emission electric cars for the state fleet.

State agencies and the utility Portland General Electric agreed to work together to create a recharging network and the technology that would allow parked electric cars to send power back to the grid.

Such initiatives are considered critical for electric car drivers so they do not have to return home every time their vehicles are low on power.

Similarly, General Motors is working to roll out recharging stations, according to Britta Gross, manager of GM’s hydrogen and electrical infrastructure commercialization efforts.

GM’s Chevrolet Volt plug-in car will have an all-electric range of 40 miles and a backup gasoline tank for longer trips.

Nissan said the initial cruising range for its first generation of electric cars could be 100 miles, but the company will look to boost that to near 200 miles by the second generation of the battery pack.

As a result, Nissan said it would lease the batteries to consumers to keep the up-front price of the cars down while giving them an easy way to upgrade.

GM, which has said the Volt’s price tag could top $30,000, hasn’t decided what it will do with the Volt batteries.

“If your monthly fee for the amortization of the battery, the electric cost, etc., is less than fuel … then it’s an interesting business model to pursue,” Volt line manager Tony Posawatz said. “But those are things we don’t need to decide today.”

Click Here for the Original Article